Its almost like last week’s news, and there certainly has been some activity on this front on some of the blogs out there, e.g. Pie, BMOC, Craig and John Newton amongst others. In case you are not aware, this is what has sparked the sudden activity, CMIS.
From the link above there is some information on the focus of the first version of the spec, and it is very much early days:
“The initial set of deliverables will be targeted for the following use cases:
- Collaborative Content Applications
- Portals leveraging Content Management repositories
- Mashups
The following use cases should be able to be supported by CMIS Domain Model and Bindings, but are not primary drivers:
- Workflow and BPM-centric applications utilizing Content
- Archival Applications
- Compound and Virtual Documents
- Electronic and Legal Discovery
The following use cases are out of scope for the initial set of deliverables:
- Records Management and Compliance
- Digital Asset Management
- Web Content Management
- Subscription and Notification Services”
I find this quite interesting, especially the move of RM to a later release. I do need to read the spec, printed it out today, but I hope that the minimum that it deals with are the Basic Content services. I can see the logic behind the drivers re Portal and Mash Ups, this is where we would expect current integration pain to be but I would think RM is such an important factor in the current climate that it would need early consideration. However I would not be surprised if one of the reasons for not having this in early is, to put it crudely, it is hard. I don’t mean necessarily implementation is hard but getting concensus on what would constitute RM is difficult with the various standards out there, e.g. DOD, MoReq2, etc…. There is also the question of whether compliance to these adds value to the customer, interesting discussions to be had. I’ll read the specs and post again.
Observing Content Management 
If you have any questions about MoReq or MoReq2 (note please, not “MoReq II”), or how they relate to other standards, just let me know.
Marc Fresko
MoReq2 Project Leader
Thanks Marc,
There are differences in the standards and how they can be interpreted, this is necessary usually due to legislation in individual countries. I would understand if the group behind CMIS have decided that moving into this area is too much for the first release.
Also I think we need to be questioning what compliance to each of these means. I do not see full compliance as being something which should be sought by most, possibly even all, organisations. They should use the standards as a guide to best practice in the implementation of RM, but focus on the areas which are relevant to them. Again for a group seeking to define some standards for interoperability it places further doubt in the mind.
Having read the spec now I see there are ways in which various elements can be implemented, certainly around the use of policies.
Pingback: Opportunities « Observing Content Management